Abacavir Sulfate with Lamivudine, tablet, 600 mg (base) - 300 mg, Kivexa®, July 2005
Public Summary Document for Abacavir Sulfate with Lamivudine, tablet, 600 mg (base) - 300 mg, Kivexa®, July 2005.
Page last updated: 24 October 2005
Public Summary Document
Product: Abacavir Sulfate with Lamivudine, tablet, 600 mg (base) - 300 mg, Kivexa®,
Sponsor: GlaxoSmithKline Australia
Date of PBAC Consideration: July 2005
1. Purpose of Application
This application sought listing on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) as a Section
100 item (Highly Specialised Drug) for the treatment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus
(HIV). (Highly Specialised Drugs (HSDs) are medicines for the treatment of chronic
conditions, which, because of their clinical use or other special features, are restricted
to prescribing through public and private hospitals which have appropriate specialist
facilities.)
2. Background
This product had not previously been considered by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory
Committee (PBAC).
3. Registration Status
Kivexa tablets were approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration on 7 March 2005
for use "in antiretroviral combination therapy for the treatment of HIV infection
in adults and adolescents from 12 years of age".
4. Listing Requested and PBAC’s View
The sponsor requested the following listing:
Section 100
Private hospital authority required
Treatment, in combination with other antiretroviral agents, of HIV infection in patients
over 12 years of age, with:
(a) CD4 cell counts of less than 500 per cubic millimetre; or
(b) viral load of greater than 10,000 copies per mL.
The PBAC noted that the sponsor had agreed the listing be modified to (a) restrict
treatment to patients weighing 40 kg or more in accordance with the Australian approved
product information and because this is a fixed dose product, and (b) to remove the
reference to combination with other antiretroviral agents for consistency with the
restrictions of similar PBS-listed products.
5. Clinical Place for the Proposed Therapy
Abacavir and lamivudine are Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NRTIs) and
are potent, selective inhibitors of HIV-1 and HIV-2. Combination therapy, comprising
of at least three antiretroviral agents, is standard care in the management of HIV
infection. As part of this therapy, dual NRTI use is widely recommended.
6. Comparator
The submission nominated abacavir co-administered with lamivudine, both as single
agents as the comparator. This was considered appropriate by PBAC.
7. Clinical Trials
The submission presented the results of one key clinical trial, CAL30001 and two supportive
trials, ESS30008 and CNA30021.
All studies had been published at the time of submission, as follows:
Trial/first author |
Protocol title |
Publication citation |
---|---|---|
CAL30001/ 1. Clumeck N 2. Craig C |
A Phase III, randomized, open-label, parallel, multicenter study to evaluate treatment with fixed-dose combination of abacavir/lamivudine (600mg/300mg) once-daily versus abacavir (300mg) twice-daily and lamivudine (300mg) once-daily in combination with tenofovir once-daily and a new PI or NNRTI for 48 weeks in ART-experienced HIV-1 infected patients. | 1. 44th ICAAC Washington Oct 30-Nov 2 2004 Poster H-558. 2. 7th International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV infection. Glasgow 14-18 Nov 2004. Poster 314. |
ESS30008/ 1. Watson M 2. Sosa N |
A Phase III, 48-week, open-label, randomized, multicenter study of the safety and efficacy of the abacavir/lamivudine fixed dose combination tablet administered QD versus abacavir + lamivudine administered BID in combination with a PI or NNRTI in antiretroviral experienced patients. | 1. 7th International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV infection. Glasgow 14-18 Nov
2004. Poster P44 2. Ibid Poster P45. |
CNA30021/ 1. Gazzard B 2. Craig C 3. Hernandez J 4. Gordon D |
A Phase III, 48-week, randomized, double-blind multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the abacavir 600mg once daily vs abacavir 300mg BID in combination with lamivudine (300mg once daily) and efavirenz (600mg once daily) in antiretroviral therapy naïve HIV-1 infected subjects. | 1. 43rd ICAAC Chicago 14-17 Sept 2003. Abs H-1722b 2. 11th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections San Francisco Feb 8-11 2004. Poster 551. 3. XV IAC Bangkok July 11-16 2004 Poster TuPeB 4521. 4. ibid Poster WePeB 5868. |
Trial CNA30021 was not considered by PBAC on the grounds that it did not evaluate
the efficacy or safety of the fixed combination tablet.
8. Results of Trials
In the two clinical trials, CAL30001 and ESS 30008, the fixed combination of abacavir
600 mg with lamivudine 300 mg was no worse than concomitant administration of the
single agents in any of the primary or secondary outcomes measured.
The toxicity profile for abacavir with lamivudine fixed dose combination tablet was
consistent with the experience from the use of the individual components.
9. Clinical Claim
The PBAC accepted the submission’s claim that the fixed combination product is no
worse than concomitant abacavir 600 mg and lamivudine 300 mg in terms of efficacy
and toxicity.
10. Economic Analysis
A cost minimisation analysis was presented based on monthly treatments cost (ex-manufacturer)
of the single agents. This approach was considered acceptable by PBAC.
11. Estimated PBS Usage and Financial Implications
The submission claimed that listing of the fixed dose combination would not have any
net financial cost for the PBS, as the majority of usage would replace the combination
use of the individual components. The submission further claimed that as it could
also replace some more expensive NRTIs, the listing of Kivexa could result in some
savings to the PBS.
12. Recommendation and Reasons
Consistent with its policy on fixed dose combination products, the PBAC recommended
listing on a cost-minimisation basis compared to the corresponding strengths of the
individual components as the data from the two prospectively designed non-inferiority
trials indicate once daily Kivexa as requested has similar safety and efficacy compared
to concomitant abacavir 600 mg and lamivudine 300 mg daily.
Recommendation
List
Section 100 (Highly Specialised Drugs):
Restriction: | Private hospital authority required Treatment of HIV infection in patients over 12 years of age, weighing 40 kg or more, with: (a) CD4 cell counts of less than 500 per cubic millimetre; or (b) viral load of greater than 10,000 copies per mL. |
Pack Size: | 30 |
13. Context for Decision
The PBAC helps decide whether and, if so, how medicines should be subsidised in Australia.
It considers submissions in this context. A PBAC decision not to recommend listing
or not to recommend changing a listing does not represent a final PBAC view about
the merits of the medicine. A company can resubmit to the PBAC or seek independent
review of the PBAC decision.
14. Sponsor’s Comment