EDARAVONE
Information current as at: 1 July 2026
Submission Details
- Brand name:
-
- Radicava®
- Form and strength:
-
Please search for and view the meeting agenda from the relevant meeting for more information
- Submission sponsor:
- TEVA PHARMA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
- Condition/indication:
(therapeutic use) -
- Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)
- Listing requested:
- Please see meeting agenda for more information
- Funding program:
- Please see meeting agenda for more information
- Request authority level:
- Please see meeting agenda for more information
- PBAC Submission type:
- Change to existing listing (–)
- Comment:
- Considered prior to the March 2026 PBAC meeting.
- Other PBAC consideration:
- --
Progress Details
-
Submission received for: - March 2026 PBAC meeting
-
Opportunity for consumer comment: - Open 19/11/2025 and close 21/01/2026 (see PBS Website)
-
PBAC meeting: - Held on 11/03/2026
-
Lodgement of required documentation: - 04/02/2026
-
Acceptance of complete documentation:
- Accepted
-
Agreement to listing arrangements: - Commenced on 10/02/2026
-
Status:
- Finalised
-
Government processes: - Commenced on 10/02/2026
-
Medicine listed on the PBS: - 01/04/2026 (see PBS schedule)
PBAC Outcome
The PBAC recommended adding a Section 100 (Highly Specialised Drugs (HSD) Community
Access (CA)) listing of edaravone for initial treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis,
enabling community-based neurologists to initiate therapy. The PBAC considered this
change to improve flexibility and equitable access for patients through community
and hospital settings, particularly in rural and remote areas. The PBAC advised that
the existing Section 100 HSD Public and Private Hospital listings should be removed
to avoid multiple PBS item codes, as the CA listing will also continue to allow access
in hospital settings.
The PBAC recommended including a caution regarding rare but clinically significant
hypersensitivity risks, such as anaphylaxis and severe asthmatic episodes in susceptible
individuals based on input received from clinical representative group for this treatment
area.
The PBAC considered that patients who commenced edaravone privately and met eligibility
criteria at initiation (i.e., grandfathered patients) were intended to be able to
transition to PBS-subsidised therapy under the existing restrictions. The PBAC noted
the sponsor had indicated the wording of the existing restrictions may require further
clarification to ensure the intention of the listing is clear for prescribers of these
patients. To support this, the PBAC advised amending the initial treatment criteria
for clarity, enabling these patients to receive their first PBS supply under the initial
treatment restriction and continue therapy under the continuing treatment restriction.
The PBAC advised that prescribers should request quantities sufficient for one month
per dispensing, aligned with the treatment cycle.
The PBAC considered the financial impact of these changes to be minor as the patient
groups were included in the original estimates, with only a small additional cost
to the PBS due to differences in fees and mark-ups between the Section 100 HSD Public
hospital and CA programs which it considered would be mitigated by the existing Risk
Sharing Arrangement.
