TRASTUZUMAB DERUXTECAN
Information current as at: 1 July 2026
Submission Details
- Brand name:
-
- Enhertu®
- Form and strength:
-
Please search for and view the meeting agenda from the relevant meeting for more information
- Submission sponsor:
- ASTRAZENECA PTY LTD
- Condition/indication:
(therapeutic use) -
- Breast cancer
- Listing requested:
- Please see meeting agenda for more information
- Funding program:
- PBS Section 100 (Efficient Funding of Chemotherapy Program)
- Request authority level:
- Please see meeting agenda for more information
- PBAC Submission type:
- Change to listing (Category 2)
- Comment:
- --
- Other PBAC consideration:
- --
Progress Details
-
Submission received for: - March 2026 PBAC meeting
-
Opportunity for consumer comment: - Open 19/11/2025 and close 21/01/2026 (see PBS Website)
-
PBAC meeting: - Held on 11/03/2026
-
PBAC outcome published: - Not Recommended (see PBAC Outcomes)
-
5Lodgement of required documentation:
-
6Agreement to listing arrangements:
- Has not yet commenced
-
7Government processes:
- Has not yet commenced
-
8Medicine listed on the PBS:
- Has not yet occurred
PBAC Outcome
The PBAC did not recommend listing trastuzumab deruxtecan (Enhertu®) on the PBS for the treatment of adult patients with hormone receptor positive (HR-positive) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low or HER2-ultralow unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who have received at least one prior line of endocrine therapy (ET) in the metastatic setting and are no longer suitable for further ET. The PBAC welcomed input from health professionals and organisations, which highlighted the burden of metastatic breast cancer and its treatment on patients and noted the value of choice in deciding the order of treatments for mBC.
The PBAC accepted that trastuzumab deruxtecan was more effective than chemotherapy in improving the length of time that patients lived without their cancer getting worse in patients with HER2-low mBC, but considered that the evidence included in the submission did not allow confidence about the extent of benefit for patients with HER2-ultralow mBC because of the small number of these patients in the trial and uncertainty in the testing to identify HER2-ultralow mBC. The PBAC noted that trastuzumab deruxtecan caused a clear increase in harms compared with chemotherapy including life-threatening adverse events, and did not appear to extend life expectancy.
The claimed benefits of trastuzumab deruxtecan were, in the PBAC’s view, uncertain and overestimated. The PBAC advised that trastuzumab deruxtecan was not cost effective at the price requested when more realistic estimates of benefits and costs were considered.
