EFGARTIGIMOD ALFA

Information current as at: 1 July 2026

PBAC meeting date: March 2026
Legend: Completed N In progress Not applicable N Yet to commence

Submission Details

Brand name:
  • Vyvgart®
Form and strength:

Please search for and view the meeting agenda from the relevant meeting for more information

Submission sponsor:
ARGENX AUSTRALIA PTY. LTD.
Condition/indication:
(therapeutic use)
  • Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP)
Listing requested:
Please see meeting agenda for more information
Funding program:
PBS General Schedule
Request authority level:
Please see meeting agenda for more information
PBAC Submission type:
Change to existing listing (Category 1)
Comment:
--
Other PBAC consideration:
--

Progress Details

Submission received for:
March 2026 PBAC meeting
Opportunity for consumer comment:
Open 19/11/2025 and close 21/01/2026 (see PBS Website)
PBAC meeting:
Held on 11/03/2026
PBAC outcome published:
Not Recommended (see PBAC Outcomes)
5Lodgement of required documentation:
6Agreement to listing arrangements:
Has not yet commenced
7Government processes:
Has not yet commenced
8Medicine listed on the PBS:
Has not yet occurred

PBAC Outcome

PBAC Recommendation:

The PBAC did not recommend efgartigimod alfa (Vyvgart®) for the treatment active chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) in patients whose symptoms continue despite treatment with blood products such as immunoglobulin and for those who cannot tolerate immunoglobulin. CIDP is a chronic autoimmune nerve disorder. 

The PBAC acknowledged the consumer input received and considered that there is a high unmet need for additional treatment options for people with CIDP. However, the PBAC was not satisfied that the available evidence clearly demonstrated which patients should receive efgartigimod in clinical practice, nor how patients would be safely switched from immunoglobulin treatment to efgartigimod alfa.

As the clinical benefits compared with immunoglobulin treatment were uncertain, the PBAC considered that the economic analysis and high estimated cost to the public did not provide enough certainty or information for decision making.

Public Summary Document:
Not yet available

Case ID
a1161
Page last updated
30 June 2026
v.9.19