TAFAMIDIS

Information current as at: 1 July 2026

PBAC meeting date: March 2026
Legend: Completed N In progress Not applicable N Yet to commence

Submission Details

Brand name:
  • Vyndamax®
Form and strength:

Please search for and view the meeting agenda from the relevant meeting for more information

Submission sponsor:
PFIZER AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
Condition/indication:
(therapeutic use)
  • Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM)
Listing requested:
Please see meeting agenda for more information
Funding program:
PBS General Schedule
Request authority level:
Please see meeting agenda for more information
PBAC Submission type:
Other business (Category 3)
Comment:
--
Other PBAC consideration:
--

Progress Details

Submission received for:
March 2026 PBAC meeting
Opportunity for consumer comment:
Open 19/11/2025 and close 21/01/2026 (see PBS Website)
PBAC meeting:
Held on 11/03/2026
PBAC outcome published:
Not Recommended (see PBAC Outcomes)
Lodgement of required documentation:
Not applicable
Agreement to listing arrangements:
Not applicable
Government processes:
Not applicable
Medicine listed on the PBS:
Not applicable

PBAC Outcome

PBAC Recommendation:

The PBAC did not recommend changes to the risk sharing arrangement (RSA) for tafamidis for the treatment of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). The PBAC agreed that a change to the RSA expenditure caps may be appropriate, but not to the degree proposed. The PBAC considered that the revised financial estimates and prevalence data presented in the submission were uncertain. The PBAC recognised that newer diagnostic techniques (i.e. bone scanning) have increased ATTR-CM diagnosis, and expanded the population treated with tafamidis above the existing patient estimates. The PBAC raised concerns that the expanded population may differ from the population that was originally recommended for PBS listing, especially with different diagnostic criteria and the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The PBAC advised that a submission was required that provides evidence supporting equivalence between diagnosis of ATTR-CM using the clinical trial (ATTRACT) criteria and bone scanning, and that the magnitude of benefit is the same across the whole population. 

Public Summary Document:
Not yet available

Case ID
a1182
Page last updated
30 June 2026
v.9.19